View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0000082GeoSetterImage Datapublic2010-01-30 19:51
Reporterbabar Assigned ToFriedemann  
PrioritynormalSeverityfeatureReproducibilityalways
Status resolvedResolutionfixed 
Product Version2.2.4 release 
Target VersionFixed in Version3.2.20 beta 
Summary0000082: add heading to geodata
DescriptionIt would be very usefull to be able to add the the heading to the photos as this could be use to properly orientate the photos in google earth when viewing them.
It is also a very useful information for some jobs, that require heading information with any field observation.
Heading must be given according to a reference : either magnetic north or true North.

Most reading given by Handled GPS or GPS track will be relative to true North.

But from a normal compass with a needle will be relative to Magnetic North. In that case If people want to orientate the photo according to true North (to use it in google earth for example) they either need to correct the magnetic declination themselves (and I suppose many people won't) or the software need to correct it for them.
On top of that there are different model/data that could be used for correction and give slightly different results. (Well of course most people will be happy with any model, but some people such as geographs or geologist might not)
So to make it simple for people I suppose the best thing would be to give a choice between
-Using the bearing info recorded on the track log/computed from the track log(speed vector) -->Case when the bearing is relative to true north
Plus in that particular case when we use a tracklog we should fill the exif fields called direction of movement and reference for direction of movement
-entering manually the bearing by either drawing it on the map -->Case when the bearing is relative to true north ,
-Entering the bearing by typing it in (most probably from a magnetic compass reading) --> Case when the bearing is relative to magnetic north .

In the case of a bearing relative to magnetic north we could then add a button to propose the user to correct the magnectic declination and record the bearing relative to true north instead of magnetic north.

I include here a few links on some intertesting web site that either provide useful information on earth magnetic field or provide tools to compute the declination correction.
 
http://www.geocities.com/magnetic_declination/
->useful info and many links to web resources - best link you will find a lot of links to decliantion calculator or opensource software to compute the declination / http://www.best.com/~williams
 
http://forum.worldwindcentral.com/showthread.php?t=5781
some software related info with worldwind
 
 
the very top of course then would be to add in the comments which model was used, to correct the declination but that is maybe too much :) for most people
 
Best regards
TagsNo tags attached.

Relationships

parent of 0000398 resolvedFriedemann 35mm equivalent focal length will not be read for all images 
related to 0000411 assignedFriedemann Calculate magnetic declination to convert magnetic heading values to geographic North 
related to 0000412 assignedFriedemann Option for length of heading triangles in map 

Activities

mawosch

2008-01-01 20:53

reporter   ~0000157

Here are some personal notes.
I do not understand the deeper background of the request. Sure it is possible to get the bearing out of the gpx track. But what info do you have then? Only the bearing info of the movement of the GPS receiver.
You have NO information of the bearing of the camera.
I think such a function is not very wise.

babar

2008-01-01 23:46

reporter   ~0000162

Hello,
I was more thinking about the tracks that some gps device with integrated compass can log (garmin Magellan,...). I do not have such a gps but I have found somewhere a guy that sells something to attach a garmin gps to the flash connector of a camera so that when you take a photo it triggers it to log a point with bearing.
From that I did suppose that those Gps may be able to log with the track the actual bearing of the unit.
In other cases you would indeed be using the velocity vector, which may not be aligned with the bearing of the photos and thus is much less interesting as you pointed out.
Because I think it is difficult or even impossible for the software to know whether the bearing of a tacklog is a real mesure or a value computed from the velocity vector, the safe thing would be to record in the exif field dedicated to the direction of movement. It would be up then to the user to copy the value in the direction of photography with a cli.
Another thought is that we usually take photo of what lays in front of us or we usually walks towards what we want to photography (not always of course but most of the time) so the velocity vector (if the error on that vector is not too big either) is a first good approximation of the direction of the photo, and could then prove useful for the user when he wants to refine that bearing using google maps.
Regards

babar

2008-03-20 20:45

reporter   ~0000460

here is a link to a software that does it nicely
(appart from the fact that I do not think you need to populate the exif field called "destination", since the photograph do not really go to the place he photographies)
http://creativetech.inn.leedsmet.ac.uk/software/EGT/ [^]
I like the fact that it display a transparent triangle from the photo position , that represent the field of view of the camera.
>
Once done exporting when exporting the photo to google earth we would also be able to orientate it. See issue 83
Regards
Eric

babar

2010-01-19 23:44

reporter   ~0000792

I saw that many feature request related to heading were lost , but I remember you asking how to create a triangle with varying opacity.
I have found 2 possibility use SVG -> simple xml format for vectorial graphics. It support varying opacity.
However internet explorer do not support svg yet, instead they support vml. With VML you can also achieve that with a jpeg background. I believe google map support vml and svg overlay

but before having that if it is too difficult too implement it would be great to have at least 2 field, one to enter the azimuth value and one to select the reference id: magnetic north or geographic north
Best regards
Thank you

Friedemann

2010-01-20 23:52

administrator   ~0000796

Last edited: 2010-01-21 00:03

Please try current beta 3.2.9 (http://www.geosetter.de/geosetter_beta.exe ). It now should support image direction and image direction reference. When reference is magnetic, a "(M)" is shown in the image browser. I don't know if geographic or magnetic reference is more common.

Ah, I just see that the new values will be read only from Exif, not XMP. But it will be written already to XMP.

Friedemann

2010-01-21 00:10

administrator   ~0000798

As I just see, it's possible to only save a direction value without having coordinates. I think this is not good, is it?

babar

2010-01-21 22:11

reporter   ~0000799

Great I 'll download it right away.

As for the reference occurence, when the direction is taken from a map it is geographic of course, but from a device I would say magnetic north is the most common reading as the geographic one usually requieres the device to have a built in map of magnetic anomaly or at least to know where the magnetic north lies.

For thez last question having the direction only make sense in 2 situation (at least that I can think of)

1- the device capture the direction,( as compass always works even if it gives the wrong direction) but the gps does not work. Then the user will need to manually put the photo on the map.

2-for sky pictures (stars,...) you only need a rough position (at least for none professional like most of us) but you need a good direction to know which stars are on the photo

Friedemann

2010-01-21 22:51

administrator   ~0000800

Do you perhaps have a track file containing direction data?

I already have GPX files containing something like this

<trkpt lat="54.9064649" lon="8.3106449">
 <ele>-5.000000</ele>
 <time>2009-06-16T11:50:17Z</time>
 <desc>Lat.=54.9064649, Long.=8.3106449, Alt.=-5m, Speed=1Km/h, Course=251deg.</desc>
<extensions>
</extensions>
</trkpt>

So I have to extract the Course value (as I'm doing it already with speed). I would interprete it as magnetic.

babar

2010-01-22 14:03

reporter   ~0000801

Last edited: 2010-01-22 14:59

Unfortunatelly I do not have tracks.
So far I write down the compass reading :). I have a new android phone and there are some utilities supposed to do that but I haven't had the chance to go out using them yet. The most common automated process I have seen is the one used by nikon camera, as the gps units connected on them are also able to transmit their bearing (Magnetic). In this case there is no track, every thing is directly written to the exif. Solmeta is supposed to produce a new unit able to log such tracks but I haven't seen it yet.

As for the course, I think this represent the direction of deplacement of the unit, as opposed to the orientation of the unit (bearing or heading - I am not sure). In this case the direction is computed from the track point and therefore are relative to the geographic north.
I think (not sure)that GPX spec says that the heading and bearing should be given relative to the Geographic north. But few units can do that.
The exif are able to save this info in the direction of displacement.

Friedemann

2010-01-23 13:42

administrator   ~0000804

I'm just working on showing the direction in the map. It can then be adjusted also by using the map.

BUT: I didn't find a formula or something like this to calculate the magnetic declination. I just found this http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/IAGA/vmod/igrf.html But I don't know how I can use it. Does anybody know how the declination can be calculated approximately?

Friedemann

2010-01-23 13:57

administrator   ~0000805

Another question: As it is now possible to set the location where the camera is pointed to by using the map for calculating the direction, I'm asking myself if it would make sense to also save this location as GPS destination coordinates?

2010-01-24 03:59

 

geosetter_heading1.jpg (243,490 bytes)
geosetter_heading1.jpg (243,490 bytes)

2010-01-24 04:00

 

geosetter_heading2.jpg (245,227 bytes)
geosetter_heading2.jpg (245,227 bytes)

Friedemann

2010-01-24 04:03

administrator   ~0000809

It's now possible to see image directions on the map and it's also possible to adjust and add them by using the map, see attached screenshots.

Can you perhaps take a look at the current beta version (http://www.geosetter.de/geosetter_beta.exe )? I think it has to be tested not only by me ;-)

There's no calculation of magnetic declination by now :-(

Some track files contain direction data. In the beta version this data will be synchronized. I'm not sure if this is good without asking the user, because in most cases this direction data doesn't have anything to do with taken images. What do you think?

babar

2010-01-24 13:54

reporter   ~0000810

That's absolutely great. I will test it right away!

GPS destination coordinates make sense in some cases but not always so I would not fill that automatically. Same for the track containing direction data, I believe we should ask the user in case these direction data are directions of the GPS movement.


to correct the declination you can have a look ther, they give the source code in C and the data.
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/geomag/WMM/soft.shtml

an example of web site using it with google map:
http://www.magnetic-declination.com/what-is-magnetic-declination.php

Friedemann

2010-01-24 15:29

administrator   ~0000811

> to correct the declination you can have a look ther, they give
> the source code in C and the data.
> http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/geomag/WMM/soft.shtml [^]

thank you very much. I will take a look at it now.

I just fixed some minor GUI issues in a new beta version (3.2.11) and on the map.

babar

2010-01-24 17:36

reporter   ~0000812

I will test it now. Yes I noticed in last version that the button to display image with direction data was not functionning. But the remaining stuff was great.

babar

2010-01-24 21:58

reporter   ~0000813

a few thing about the current version:

-the blue triangle does not seem to show hide anything.
-when you click the show point of view in map, nothing happens if the image has no direction set yet. Maybe it should then allow to digitize the direction for the selected image (can only work if only one image is selected)

-during export to google earth you could had the heading in the <lookat> or <orientation> element of the KML file. that would be great too.

babar

2010-01-24 22:23

reporter   ~0000814

when reopenening image with direction geosetters detects the direction as being magnetic even if they are geographic.
I also had one error that said that the direction was set as -90 instead of 270.

Anyway
what you have done is just great!!!

Friedemann

2010-01-24 22:55

administrator   ~0000815

> -the blue triangle does not seem to show hide anything.

Excuse me, I don't understand... What should be hidden?

By the way, when zooming in to maximum zoom level, sometimes the triangles will not be shown by Google Maps. I think this is a problem of Google.

> -when you click the show point of view in map, nothing happens
> if the image has no direction set yet.

Yes, the "Show Point of View" only shows the point of the currently focused image if it has a direction already. If it hasn't a direction you can click on the purple marker and then click on "Add Image Direction" in the appearing hint window.

> when reopenening image with direction geosetters detects the direction
> as being magnetic even if they are geographic.

thank you, you are right. I just fixed it.

> I also had one error that said that the direction was set as
> -90 instead of 270.

I can not reproduce this by now, but isn't it the same -90 and 270. Ok, I think only 0 <= value <= 359.9 is allowed. How did you get the -90? After saving or by setting it on the map?

babar

2010-01-25 13:45

reporter   ~0000816

> -the blue triangle does not seem to show hide anything.

Excuse me, I don't understand... What should be hidden?

I meant I did press that button called show all image directions, but nothing happened.

> I also had one error that said that the direction was set as
> -90 instead of 270.

I got that error when saving changes (exif tool minor error) so I do not know how it came. yes -90=270 but apparently it is not standard for exif.
I cannot reproduce it either now.

Regards

Friedemann

2010-01-25 13:53

administrator   ~0000817

> I meant I did press that button called show all image
> directions, but nothing happened.

The directions will only be shown if the images are shown on the map (as blue markers).

> I got that error when saving changes (exif tool minor error) so
> I do not know how it came. yes -90=270 but apparently it is not
> standard for exif.

Which value is shown by GeoSetter after saving? Has it be saved with -90?

babar

2010-01-25 21:35

reporter   ~0000819

It was -90, but as soon as I clciked in the text field it asked me to inputa positive value between 0 and 360

Friedemann

2010-01-25 21:57

administrator   ~0000820

I have a function which returns the azimuth between two coordinates. Now I'm checking if the result < 0. If it is, it will be changed to 360-result.

babar

2010-01-27 22:47

reporter   ~0000823

after a few testing, I encoutred a situation where the google data are not available at big zoom, so you have to un-zoom, and then the transparent triangle , the marker and the direction target are all on top of each other. So I had an idea to compute the transparent triangle (that represent the field of view) size:

use the following equation:

d=height of the triangle in km
h=height above the see level in km
R=earth radius=6300km and 2R=12600km
d=sqrt(h*(12600+h))


demonstration is on wikipedia

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potenz_(Geometrie)

Friedemann

2010-01-27 23:00

administrator   ~0000824

> So I had an idea to compute the transparent triangle (that represent the
> field of view) size:

But what's wrong with the current triangles? I calculate them already in GeoSetter and add them as a polygon in Google Maps. I keep the area of the traingles constant, so at a lower focal length they are shorter than on a higher focal length. That they won't be shown sometimes on highest zoom level is in my opinion a problem of Google Maps, not of the calculated triangle.

What do you think I should do with your equations???

babar

2010-01-27 23:17

reporter   ~0000826

oh nothing wrong, just a suggestion the equation gives the theoretical maximum view distance from a given point on earth at a given altitude.
Say you are at sea level, the horizon lies at about 4.5 km, so you cannot capture anything futher than 4.5 km
say you are on mont Blanc in french alps, then your horizons lies at 225km, on your photo you can see things that are 225 km away.
Of course this is true if you do not have another big mountain just in front.

There was another thing I forgot to say, every time you move the target marker the map recenters on the photo position, this may be sometime annoying, because this may move the target marker out of view, and if you want to fine tune it's position again you have to move the map again.

babar

2010-01-27 23:22

reporter   ~0000827

thinking about another potential problem
what if we are using a fish eye with exactly 180 view angle ? or more, I have no such lense to test sorry.
so just a question about this case, do you draw a circle in this case ?

Friedemann

2010-01-27 23:22

administrator   ~0000828

Ahhh, ok, I understand.... :-) Then I also understand the acrticle on Wikipedia now. Maybe this is really a good idea, thank you! I will try it out.

> There was another thing I forgot to say, every time you move the
> target marker the map recenters on the photo position

Yes, I noticed it for myself. This should be fixed in the new beta 3.2.15

Friedemann

2010-01-27 23:31

administrator   ~0000829

Last edited: 2010-01-27 23:32

> thinking about another potential problem
> what if we are using a fish eye with exactly 180 view angle ?
> or more, I have no such lense to test sorry.

But the fisheye also have a focal length of perhaps 10mm. At the moment I have restricted the focal length to a minimum of 10mm (nearly 130º). So if the focal length is for example 5mm (compact camera without 35mm equivalent value) or 0mm, then you will see a 130º angle.

Friedemann

2010-01-27 23:34

administrator   ~0000830

As far as I know it's not possible to recognize a fisheye in the standard Exif data. So such special lenses won't be considered for a correct showing of field of view.

babar

2010-01-28 00:38

reporter   ~0000832

>Ahhh, ok, I understand.... :-) Then I also understand the acrticle on Wikipedia now. Maybe this is really a good idea, thank you! I will try it out.

Sorry I reallised I completely forgot to explain :)

>At the moment I have restricted the focal length to a minimum of 10mm (nearly 130º)
That is a good solution I think. just wanted to know how it was handeled by curiosity.

last think would it be possible to had an icon on image with direction, as is done with the blue marker on image with position, as well as add a filter option , so we can quicly see those image with no direction.

Any way I think this feature is now absolutely great... near perfection :)

karlm

2010-01-28 17:05

reporter   ~0000833

Hi Friedemann,

I agree, this a great addition to the program!

I find though that when the map is refreshed after a zoom into or out of the map, old image-view triangles from previous zooms are still left in the map, please see attached screen shots. Is there any setting I have missed that avoids this?

The same thing happens when I make the image-view triangles visible by pressing F5.

Cheers,

Karl

2010-01-28 17:05

 

Geosetter1.jpg (418,558 bytes)

2010-01-28 17:06

 

Geosetter2.jpg (456,372 bytes)

Friedemann

2010-01-28 22:57

administrator   ~0000836

@karlm

> I find though that when the map is refreshed after a zoom into
> or out of the map, old image-view triangles from previous zooms
> are still left in the map, please see attached screen shots.

yes, I see. I can't reproduce it by now, but it seems to be a problem of Google Maps in my opinion. Is it possible to describe how to reproduce it?

Friedemann

2010-01-28 23:04

administrator   ~0000838

> would it be possible to had an icon on image with direction,
> as is done with the blue marker on image with position,

yes

> as well as add a filter option , so we can quicly see those
> image with no direction.

you can do this already by using the custom filter (or search). You can define a named custom filter which then will appear in the menu.

babar

2010-01-29 00:13

reporter   ~0000839

A last thought,if you wish to correct for the declination of the azimuth relative to magnetic north, maybe you can use the available online calculator as you do with the geonames?
the just retract the declination value to the azimuth.

karlm

2010-01-29 08:54

reporter   ~0000840

You can reproduce it by zooming with the image markers off center of the map, as shown in the screen shots.

Friedemann

2010-01-29 09:49

administrator   ~0000841

> You can reproduce it by zooming with the image markers off
> center of the map, as shown in the screen shots.

I have 8 blue makers on the map with blue triangles and the purple focus marker. I zoom in and out and in and out, but I can not reproduce this. That's why I'm asking about a more specific description. How are you zooming? By using the mouse scroll wheel or by using the slider control?

karlm

2010-01-29 10:52

reporter   ~0000842

Sorry about that. Here is an example:
1. Open Geosetter (Geosetter3.jpg)
2. Activate "Show All Image Directions"
3. Drag image markers off the center of the map (Geosetter4.jpg)
4. Zoom in one step using the slider control (Geosetter5.jpg)
5. Zoom out one step using the slider control (Geosetter6.jpg)

2010-01-29 10:52

 

Geosetter3.jpg (519,607 bytes)

2010-01-29 10:53

 

Geosetter4.jpg (524,861 bytes)

2010-01-29 10:53

 

Geosetter5.jpg (493,832 bytes)

2010-01-29 10:54

 

Geosetter6.jpg (527,691 bytes)

karlm

2010-01-29 11:06

reporter   ~0000843

I should have added that nothing happens when you activate "Show All Image Directions", i.e. the blue triangles do not appear. You need to refresh the map to make them appear, either by zooming or by pressing F5.

Friedemann

2010-01-29 11:14

administrator   ~0000844

Last edited: 2010-01-29 11:18

I have a completely other behaviour:

1. After startup of GeoSetter, I see 2 markers on the map, the blue marker without a triangle, the purple marker WITH a purple triangle (see triangles1_startup.jpg). On your screenshot the purple triangle of the focus marker is not visible. That is NOT correct.
2. After pressing the button to show all triangles, the triangle of the blue marker will also be shown (see triangles2_pressed_blue_triangle_button.jpg). On your screenshot, it is not visible, and also the purple marker is not visible.

All is working ok for me, I do not have to refresh the map. I can switch the markers on and off and on and off, and they will be shown and hidden and shown and hidden ;-)

Does anybody else have such problems here?

Which Windows version are you using? Which version of Microsoft Explorer? Something doesn't work on your system as expected. But I think it's not my code ;-) There seems to be a refreshing problem.

What happens afters starting up with the missing purple triangle when you move the map so that the purple marker is outside the screen and then move the map back. Is it visible then???

2010-01-29 11:15

 

triangles1_startup.jpg (352,460 bytes)

2010-01-29 11:15

 

triangles2_pressed_blue_triangle_button.jpg (359,493 bytes)

karlm

2010-01-29 11:49

reporter   ~0000845

I am running Windows XP Pro SP3 with all updates. I usually use Firefox (version 3.5.7) as my default browser, but I also have IE8 installed.

Yes, the purple marker becomes visible when I move it out of view and then back again.

Friedemann

2010-01-29 12:27

administrator   ~0000846

> Yes, the purple marker becomes visible when I move it out of
> view and then back again.

that means in my opinion that it is a Google Maps problem maybe with Internet Explorer 8. When an object appears only after moving the map, it's not the fault of the code which created the object, it's the fault of the system which shows the object. As far as I remember I tested it already on my Windows 7 system with IE 8 and it worked ok on it. Honestly I don't know what to do at the moment...

Maybe it's a known problem of Google Maps, I will try to find it out.

Friedemann

2010-01-29 12:35

administrator   ~0000847

As I just see, I'm using also Windows XP Pro SP3 with IE8 on my development machine. So it seems to be the same configuration as yours.

2010-01-29 12:54

 

geosetter_map_test.html (39,547 bytes)

Friedemann

2010-01-29 12:57

administrator   ~0000848

Please download the attached file geosetter_map_test.html to your harddisk and open it then in IE8. It should have shown as shown on screenshot geosetter_map_test.jpg. I get the same result in IE8 and Firefox.

2010-01-29 12:58

 

geosetter_map_test.jpg (146,639 bytes)
geosetter_map_test.jpg (146,639 bytes)

Friedemann

2010-01-29 13:01

administrator   ~0000849

Of course you will only see a red line and a purple triangle because the bitmaps for the markers aren't attached...

2010-01-29 13:07

 

geosetter_map_test.zip (23,638 bytes)

Friedemann

2010-01-29 13:11

administrator   ~0000850

You can also use attached geosetter_map_test.zip which contains all needed bitmaps.

karlm

2010-01-29 18:55

reporter   ~0000851

Here is what I see when I open geosetter_map_test.html:

Geosetter8.jpg in IE8
Geosetter9.jpg in Firefox

2010-01-29 18:55

 

Geosetter8.jpg (151,078 bytes)
Geosetter8.jpg (151,078 bytes)

2010-01-29 18:55

 

Geosetter9.jpg (149,037 bytes)
Geosetter9.jpg (149,037 bytes)

Friedemann

2010-01-29 19:03

administrator   ~0000852

You didn't you the zip file, you used only the HTML, did you?

> Geosetter8.jpg in IE8

yes, I see, this is not ok. I opened the file now on several machines, XP Pro SP3 with IE8, Windows 7 with IE8, Windows 2000 with IE6... no problems. So it seems that it is something wrong or let's say different on your system/IE configuration.

> Geosetter9.jpg in Firefox

this is ok. But it doesn't help as GeoSetter uses the Internet Explorer :-/

karlm

2010-01-29 19:43

reporter   ~0000853

I uninstalled and reinstalled IE8. Now all works fine! Sorry to have caused you trouble.

Is it possible for Geosetter to use Firefox instead? I almost never use Internet Explorer and that is probably why I haven't noticed anything wrong with it before.

Friedemann

2010-01-29 19:52

administrator   ~0000854

> I uninstalled and reinstalled IE8. Now all works fine! Sorry
> to have caused you trouble.

Fine :-)

> Is it possible for Geosetter to use Firefox instead?

I'm using Firefox too normally. But unfortunately Firefox can't be embedded by using COM (ActiveX). The Internet Explorer is the only browser which offers such an interface, as far as I know.

karlm

2010-01-29 19:57

reporter   ~0000855

OK, I see. Thanks again for your help. Your program is the best!

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2007-12-31 22:05 babar New Issue
2008-01-01 03:32 Friedemann Status new => assigned
2008-01-01 03:32 Friedemann Assigned To => Friedemann
2008-01-01 20:53 mawosch Note Added: 0000157
2008-01-01 23:46 babar Note Added: 0000162
2008-03-20 20:45 babar Note Added: 0000460
2010-01-19 23:44 babar Note Added: 0000792
2010-01-20 23:52 Friedemann Note Added: 0000796
2010-01-21 00:03 Friedemann Note Edited: 0000796
2010-01-21 00:10 Friedemann Note Added: 0000798
2010-01-21 22:11 babar Note Added: 0000799
2010-01-21 22:51 Friedemann Note Added: 0000800
2010-01-22 14:03 babar Note Added: 0000801
2010-01-22 14:59 babar Note Edited: 0000801
2010-01-23 13:07 Friedemann Relationship added parent of 0000398
2010-01-23 13:42 Friedemann Note Added: 0000804
2010-01-23 13:57 Friedemann Note Added: 0000805
2010-01-24 03:59 Friedemann File Added: geosetter_heading1.jpg
2010-01-24 04:00 Friedemann File Added: geosetter_heading2.jpg
2010-01-24 04:03 Friedemann Note Added: 0000809
2010-01-24 13:54 babar Note Added: 0000810
2010-01-24 15:29 Friedemann Note Added: 0000811
2010-01-24 17:36 babar Note Added: 0000812
2010-01-24 21:58 babar Note Added: 0000813
2010-01-24 22:23 babar Note Added: 0000814
2010-01-24 22:55 Friedemann Note Added: 0000815
2010-01-25 13:45 babar Note Added: 0000816
2010-01-25 13:53 Friedemann Note Added: 0000817
2010-01-25 21:35 babar Note Added: 0000819
2010-01-25 21:57 Friedemann Note Added: 0000820
2010-01-27 22:47 babar Note Added: 0000823
2010-01-27 23:00 Friedemann Note Added: 0000824
2010-01-27 23:17 babar Note Added: 0000826
2010-01-27 23:22 babar Note Added: 0000827
2010-01-27 23:22 Friedemann Note Added: 0000828
2010-01-27 23:31 Friedemann Note Added: 0000829
2010-01-27 23:32 Friedemann Note Edited: 0000829
2010-01-27 23:34 Friedemann Note Added: 0000830
2010-01-28 00:38 babar Note Added: 0000832
2010-01-28 17:05 karlm Note Added: 0000833
2010-01-28 17:05 karlm File Added: Geosetter1.jpg
2010-01-28 17:06 karlm File Added: Geosetter2.jpg
2010-01-28 22:57 Friedemann Note Added: 0000836
2010-01-28 23:04 Friedemann Note Added: 0000838
2010-01-29 00:13 babar Note Added: 0000839
2010-01-29 08:54 karlm Note Added: 0000840
2010-01-29 09:49 Friedemann Note Added: 0000841
2010-01-29 10:52 karlm Note Added: 0000842
2010-01-29 10:52 karlm File Added: Geosetter3.jpg
2010-01-29 10:53 karlm File Added: Geosetter4.jpg
2010-01-29 10:53 karlm File Added: Geosetter5.jpg
2010-01-29 10:54 karlm File Added: Geosetter6.jpg
2010-01-29 11:06 karlm Note Added: 0000843
2010-01-29 11:14 Friedemann Note Added: 0000844
2010-01-29 11:15 Friedemann File Added: triangles1_startup.jpg
2010-01-29 11:15 Friedemann File Added: triangles2_pressed_blue_triangle_button.jpg
2010-01-29 11:18 Friedemann Note Edited: 0000844
2010-01-29 11:49 karlm Note Added: 0000845
2010-01-29 12:27 Friedemann Note Added: 0000846
2010-01-29 12:35 Friedemann Note Added: 0000847
2010-01-29 12:54 Friedemann File Added: geosetter_map_test.html
2010-01-29 12:57 Friedemann Note Added: 0000848
2010-01-29 12:58 Friedemann File Added: geosetter_map_test.jpg
2010-01-29 13:01 Friedemann Note Added: 0000849
2010-01-29 13:07 Friedemann File Added: geosetter_map_test.zip
2010-01-29 13:11 Friedemann Note Added: 0000850
2010-01-29 18:55 karlm Note Added: 0000851
2010-01-29 18:55 karlm File Added: Geosetter8.jpg
2010-01-29 18:55 karlm File Added: Geosetter9.jpg
2010-01-29 19:03 Friedemann Note Added: 0000852
2010-01-29 19:43 karlm Note Added: 0000853
2010-01-29 19:52 Friedemann Note Added: 0000854
2010-01-29 19:57 karlm Note Added: 0000855
2010-01-30 19:48 Friedemann Relationship added related to 0000411
2010-01-30 19:49 Friedemann Relationship added related to 0000412
2010-01-30 19:51 Friedemann Status assigned => resolved
2010-01-30 19:51 Friedemann Fixed in Version => 3.4.51 beta
2010-01-30 19:51 Friedemann Resolution open => fixed